AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Ww2 online scale4/15/2023 There is clear evidence of lower enlistment in the swing Midwestern states and counties, with higher enlistment in the south and the northeast (the Democratic and Republican party base regions at the time, respectively).Įnlistments in the US army by county, 1942 The map below shows enlistment rates by county in 1942 brighter yellow refers to higher enlistment rates, while deeper purple reflects lower enlistment rates. We drew on a new dataset of 9.2 million individual service records from the army, aggregated by county and year. Keeping their dissatisfaction low is vital to remaining in power. Therefore, the group most likely to benefit from selective conscription will be weak or “tenuous” supporters – swing voters – many of whom are likely to “bolt” back to their previous party. So the government doesn’t gain much from protecting those voters from enlistment. Our research suggests that strong core supporters and opponents of war are unlikely to shift their support, even in the face of losses. Governments may lose the support of not only those families but also their friends, neighbours and coworkers. Support for government and war is likely to dwindle among families who experience loss or injury. Official US conscription video during the second world war. Victory would require a military staffed by millions of soldiers, engineers, technicians and administrators, backed up by the full agricultural, industrial and intellectual power of the civilian workforce. It had to quickly convert its industrial output to a wartime footing, modernise its own military and conduct offensive operations on four continents. In December 1941, the US faced Germany and Japan with their massive modern military forces. It also helped shield certain voters who were crucial to electoral success of the Democratic Party at the next election. The way the US conscripted its military was deliberately hard to understand. Although there are a number of obvious differences between the US of the 1940s and present-day Russia, both countries used selective – rather than universal – conscription to staff their military. In recent research, my colleague Doug Atkinson and I analysed a dataset of everyone serving in the US army during the second world war. The reason why the Kremlin has not introduced a wider policy may lie in the history of conscription and its impact on public support for war. Russian president Vladimir Putin has yet to call for universal conscription, although he recently announced mobilisation of 300,000 reservists.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |